There
was a 12 year old boy whose Rebbi was bothering him to get a haircut. One day
when this happened, the boy said I am Mekabeil on myself that I will be a Nazir
until tomorrow. You might say, he is only 12 so there is no problem. However, a
12 year old is someone who is capable to make a Neder and Nezirus. So you may
be thinking, so he won’t drink wine or take a haircut for a day, so it is not a
problem. However, it is a big problem because someone who makes themselves a
Nazir today is a Nazir until Mashiach comes. The reason is, because a Nazir
stays a Nazir until he gets his haircut and brings his Korbanos and obviously
this boy couldn’t bring his Korbanos. Another problem is, the Rambam says a
Nazir must move to Erertz Yisrael because they were Goizer Tumah on Eretz
Ha’amim. So you may be thinking, let him be Shoiel on his Neder. Not so simple.
Toisafois in Maseches Niddah 46b says that the fact that a 12 year old is
Samuch L’ish is only L’hachmir and not L’hakeil. So the Mishneh L’melech says
that if someone who is Samuch L’ish makes himself a Nazir, he can’t be Shoiel
on his Neder until he turns 13. So this boy has a really serious problem. This
Shaila is in a Kuntros written between the two World Wars. It was a Tumal in
Litta. Some Rabbanim held that he is a Nazir until he becomes 13. Others held,
either he is a Nazir and then he could be Shoiel or he is not a Nazir and he
doesn’t have to be Shoiel. Mima Nafshach, either he is a Gadol or he is not a
Gadol. There were those who held that it is an Anan Sa’adi that it was a joke
and that should be a Heter. When we learned Maseches Kiddushin we spent time on
the Inyan of Kiddushin Derech S’choik. I am not sure he meant it as a joke. I
think he meant it seriously, that he wanted to be a Nazir for a day. This is
most probably one of the more difficult Shailois, and the Mussar is to tell
your children not to Chas V’shlaom, come Lidei Kach.
הצגת רשומות עם תוויות קטנים. הצג את כל הרשומות
הצגת רשומות עם תוויות קטנים. הצג את כל הרשומות
יום שלישי, 5 ביוני 2012
יום שישי, 30 במרץ 2012
Chametz In The Todah - Tzav 5770
The Korban Todah is the only Korban a Yachid can bring that
has Chomeitz in it. There is actually a Lav in the beginning of this week’s
Parsha against bringing a Korban that has Chomeitz in it. What is the
significance of the Chomeitz in the Korban Todah and why is it the only Korban
that has Chomeitz in it?
As we approach Pesach we know that Chomeitz is a sign of the
Yeitzer Horah. A sign of things that are not good and are not spiritual.
Chomeitz is Matzah with hot air in it, a lot of nothing. Therefore, it is a
sign of something negative. A Korban Todah is brought after a person was saved
from a difficulty as thanksgiving to the Ribboinoi Shel Oilam. A person does
not bring a Korban Todah after something good happens to him. If you win the
lottery you do not bring this Korban. It is only when you have a Sakana and are
saved from it that you bring the Korban Todah. Therefore, Rav Zevin explains
the idea of the Chomeitz in the Korban Todah is precisely this, every time a difficulty
falls on a person, and a person is faced with a danger and is ultimately saved,
you bring a Korban Todah that has Chomeitz and Matzah. You are recognizing that
there was Chomeitz, or Aveiros that brought the something negative, and that
you were saved. The Korban Todah is the recognition of the Chomeitz and the
Matzah of the experience.
As a matter of fact today instead of the Korban Todah we say
the Brocha of Hagoimel which says Hagoimel L’chayavim
Toivois. We recognize that there was something lacking in us that brought about
this Sakanah.
The Har Tzvi, Rav Tzvi Pesach Frank says this is the reason
that the custom is that after a woman gives birth she does not say Birchas
Hagoimel. It would seem that she should say Birchas Hagoimel as childbirth is
deemed a Sakanah?
The Har Tzvi explains, a Korban Todah is brought only for
Chayavim Toivois, that a person came into a Sakanah only because of an Aveira,
however, a woman who gave birth it is a Mitzvah and not an Aveira that brought
her into Sakanah. It is a Mitzvah to have children. So a woman can’t say
Hagoimel L’chayavim Toivois because
they are not Chayavim.
With this a second question is answered. The Minhag is that
Ketanim don’t Bentch Goimel. Every other Beracha we are Mechaneich children to
say so why is Birchas Hagoimel different? The simple answer is that our custom
is to Bentch Goimel after an Aliyah which a Kattan does not have. However, the
Halacha is that you don’t need an Aliyah according to everyone in order to
Bentch Goimel. Rav Tzvi Pesach Frank explains that Hagoimel L’chayavim Toivois, and since a Kattan
can never be considered Chayav he doesn’t get punishment for those things that
he did. If he came into a Sakana it wasn’t because of Chayavim Toivois and
therefore the language of the Beracha is totally inappropriate for a Kattan so
he wouldn’t Bentch Goimel.
So the explanation of this unique Korban the Korban Todah
that has Chomeitz fits well with the concept of Chag HaPesach, the idea that
Chomeitz represents negativity or a failing in Avoidas Hashem.
יום שני, 19 במרץ 2012
Parshas Zachor For Bar Mitzvah Boys - Zachor 5771
We Lain
Parshas Zachar once a year and it has nothing to do with the month of Adar. As
the Chasam Sofer explains, Parshas Zachar would not have to be Lained Dafka
this week. The Mitzvah is once a year to remind one’s self of what Amaleik did.
Because we know that Shicha (forgetting) is after a year. Therefore, once a
year we read the Parsha of Amaleik. We remember what Amaleik did and the
Mitzvah of Mechiyas Amaleik and before it is forgotten the next year we read it
again.
The
question is the following. What about a Bar Mitzvah boy that was Bar Mitzvah
during the summer. Now he is missing Parshas Zachor. The Chasam Sofer is saying
and I think we all agree that Parshas Zachor is not inherently a Mitzvah of the
month of Adar. For those of us who were Bar Mitzvah long ago it is fine, we can
wait another week to do Parshas Zachor because we still remember the Parshas
Zachor of 11 months ago. However, for the Bar Mitzva boy who now becomes
Michuyav in Mitzvos, why is he not obligated to read Parshas Zachor now.
Parshas Zachor according to the Terumas Hadeshen has to be read from a Sefer
Torah. Every Bar Mitzvah boy at the time of his Bar Mitzvah should Lechora have
to read Parshas Zachor from a Sefer Torah or listen to it be read in order to
be Mekayeim the Mitzvah. He is missing the Mitzvah from the day of his Bar
Mitzvah until the first Parshas Zachor.
Many
people answered that Parshas Zachor is a once a year Mitzvah. However, that is
not really true, it is not a once a year Mitzvah. It is a Mitzvah that we do
once a year but we do it once a year as the Chasam Sofer explains in order that
we are in a constant state of awareness.
The
Ragechove (Tzofnas Paneiach) was asked a Shaila. It was Erev Pesach. The
Bechorim in town needed a Siyum to be absolved from fasting on Erev Pesach,
however, the person who was making the Siyum was not Bar Mitzvah and people
were saying that it can’t count as a Siyum as after all the Limud HaTorah of a
boy under 13 is not a Mitzvah D’oraissa. The Ragechove was asked if that Siyum
is adequate.
The
Ragechove responded and said that depends if when a child learns Torah if it is
a Mitzvah D’oraissa or not. If it is not a Mitzvah D’oraissa the Siyum is not
sufficient to allow breaking a fast. The Ragechove said it is and he bases it
on a Yerushalmi.
The
Yerushalmi says that if someone fathers a child when he is a Koton and then he
becomes Bar Mitzvah and the child survived and is born that he is Mekayaim Pru
U’rvu. The reason for that is, while most Mitzvas Asei are Mitzvos that we do
with an action, a few Mitzvas Asei are Mitzvos where the result is the Mitzvah.
Pru U’rvu having the child is the result. It needs the action but the Mitzva is
the result. So fathering a child as a person under Bar Mitzvah counts as a
Mitzvah.
The same
thing. Limud Hatorah has two parts, the Masei Hamitzvah to learn and the
Totza’a, to know what you learned. To have knowledge of Torah. When a Koton
learns, the act is not a Mitzvah D’oraissa. The Maisei Hamitzvah it is not. Because
that learning could remain as a Gadol, that action of learning as a Koton counts
as a Mitzvah D’oraissa and a Siyum is good. That is what the Ragechove said.
Those
are two Mitzvos, Pru U’rvu and Limud HaTorah where the result is the Mitzvah. Parshas
Zachor should be the same. The Mitzvah of Laining Parshas Zachor is the result
that one have the knowledge, the Yidi’a, memory of Parshas Zachor. For that
reason, even if you heard Parshas Zachor as a Koton the Maise that a Koton does
is not a Mitzvah D’oraissa. However, Kol Zman the resultant Mitzvah is there, the
Mitzvah D’oraissa is Mikuyaim.
I would
add that later I saw that R’Yaakov Kamenetzky has the same Vort on Limud
HaTorah. The Rambam in the beginning of
Perek Aleph of Hilchos Talmud Torah says that if a child is not taught by his
father he has to learn Torah from when he is able to understand. R’Yaakov
Kamenetzky asks how can a Koton be Michuyav in a Mitzvah D’oraissa and he
answered that because the Yedios will remain with him later, the Mitzvah is to
learn as a Koton and cause the Mitzvah D’oraissa of Yedios of the learning that
is remaining later. A Geshmake Yesod which explains Parshas Zachor quite well.
הירשם ל-
רשומות (Atom)