‏הצגת רשומות עם תוויות פרשת בהעלתך. הצג את כל הרשומות
‏הצגת רשומות עם תוויות פרשת בהעלתך. הצג את כל הרשומות

יום ראשון, 15 באפריל 2012

Pesach And Speech - Pesach 5772



The following is a Vort  is  in the new Pachad Yitzchok, the Ma’amarai Pachad Yitzchok on Pesach which was recently released. This is the very first Maimar there, a very beautiful Yesod and as you shall see it is a Yesod which I found in the Sefer Ohr Zarua Latzadik from Rav Tzodok Hakohen on page 13.

The Yesod is the following. We find that when Moshe Rabbeinu realized that people were going to reveal to Paroh that he had killed a Mitzri and that it would be Jews who would be revealing that news to Paroh that he had killed a Mitzri, he said as it says in Shemos 2:14 (אָכֵן נוֹדַע הַדָּבָר). Which by its simple meaning means the fact that I killed a Mitzri is known. But in a deeper sense as the Medrash says and Rashi alludes to briefly (אכן נודע הדבר: כמשמעו. ומדרשו נודע לי הדבר שהייתי תמה עליו, מה חטאו ישראל מכל שבעים אומות להיות נרדים בעבודת פרך, אבל רואה אני שהם ראויים לכך). Moshe Rabbeinu was saying (אָכֵן נוֹדַע הַדָּבָר). Now I understand what is happening. The fact that the Galus (exile) in Mitzrayim is not coming to an early end is because (נוֹדַע הַדָּבָר) now I know the reason. It is because that there are Jews among us who say Lashon Hora. There are Jews among us who speak ill regarding other Jews. So that the Aveira of Lashon Hora was an Aveira in Mitzrayim for which we were not redeemed.

With this says Rav Hutner we understand why the Mitzvah of Sippur Yetzias Mitzrayim is a Mitzvah that is done with the mouth. It is a Mitzvah on the night of Pesach which involves speaking a lot. Usually we say S’yag L’chochmo Sh’tika that a wise man knows how to be silent. On this night we say (וְכָל הַמַּרְבֶּה לְסַפֵּר בִּיצִיאַת מִצְרַיִם הֲרֵי זֶה מְשֻׁבָּח). Somebody who speaks much is praiseworthy. Because this night, the Mitzvah is to be Mikadeish the Dibbur to give holiness to one’s speech as if to redeem the failure in Mitzrayim where Jews were not pure in speech.  This is Rav Hutner’s beautiful thought which of course explains why in the Haggadah we say (וַאֲפִילוּ כֻּלָּנוּ חֲכָמִים) even if we were all wise men it is a Mitzvah to speak about Yetizas Mitzrayim. I would think the reverse that even Am Horatzim (certainly Chachamim) have to speak about Yetizas Mitzrayim. What does it mean even Talmidai Chachamim?

The answer would seem to be because normally S’yag L’chochmo Sh’tika a sign of a wise man is silence. On this night (וַאֲפִילוּ כֻּלָּנוּ חֲכָמִים) even if we are all wise men (מִצְוָה עָלֵינוּ לְסַפֵּר בִּיצִיאַת מִצְרַיִם).

On Rav Hutner’s Yesod we can add that Klal Yisrael in the Midbar failed in a number of Nisyonos, but even after their failure they were still heading to Eretz Yisrael about to enter the land of Eretz Yisrael. When did it come to pass that HKB”H said stop I am not letting you into Eretz Yisrael?

That happened by the Cheit Hamiraglim, which is a sin that was associated with Lashon Hora. Whereas it says in Bamidbar 13:32 (וַיֹּצִיאוּ דִּבַּת הָאָרֶץ) the Meraglim spread a bad report on the land of Eretz Yisrael. Where the sin of Lashon Hora reared its ugly head once again. Here HKB”H said Ad Kan, you came out of Mitzrayim because you sanctified your speech and here you are failing again. This was the Aveira for which they could not enter Eretz Yisrael.

Similarly, during the sojourn in the Midbar when Miriam spoke Lashon Hora she was punished immediately. The entire camp of Klal Yisrael had to wait seven days and they had to cease their travel towards Eretz Yisrael. This was again because of the Aveira of Lashon Hora.

Rav Tzaddok in the Sefer Ohr Zarua Latzadik adds another totally different point but based on the same idea. We know that Maseches Pesachim starts with the words (אור לארבעה עשר בודקין את החמץ לאור הנר) Ohr L’arbaa Asar. It begins with the words the night of the 14th day of Nissan we do Bedikah. It uses the word (אור) light in place of Laylah which means night. The Gemara explains that the Mishna is coming to hint to us Shelo Yidabeir B’lashon Miguna, that a person should be careful to speak in a fine way. Even the word night which has negative connotations is replaced by the word Ohr or light as if to hint that a person should speak properly.

Why is this the first word of this Masechta? The hint of how to speak could have been in any Masechta or in any part of any Masechta. Says Rav Tzaddok, Zehu Haschalas Hamasechta L’horos Inyan Hamichunim Masechta Zu She’hu Inyan Hapesach. It is at the beginning of the Masechta to introduce us to the concept which this Masechta talks about and that concept is the Taharas Hadibbur fixing the Aveira of Dibbur Miguna of speaking improperly, of a lack of pureness of one’s speech. Very beautiful.

Rav Tzaddok adds that one of the virtues that Klal Yisrael had was a purity of Yichus when they left Mitzrayim they were praised with having a pure Yichus. The Yetizas Mitzrayim with a pure Yichus the Gemara says in Perek Asara Yuchsin is related to Taharas Hadibbur. Those who went out they came out with a Yichus and it became part of the Jewish mentality. Yichusa  D’kula Shtikasa. That the best Yichus is not a Yichus of a grandfather who is a Tzaddik, Talmid Chochom, or a Rebbe. Yichusa D’kula Shtikasa, the best Yichus is a family that is quiet at a moment that they can cause disputes or fights and a person who is quiet and backs off, that the Gemara says is Yichusa D’kula.

יום ראשון, 25 במרץ 2012

J018 - 2-22 - G-d Is The Travel Agent

כל המוצאות אותם - "מוצאות" ע"פ פשט צריך לפרש "קורות".
בפרשת מסעי כתוב "מוצאיהם למסעיהם" ונתקשו המפרשים לפרשו.
מלבד זה קשה בכלל איך היו שמות לכל המקומות במדבר שממה. שמא תאמר שהיו מקומות מושב, הרי מפורש בירמיה ב-ו ש"לא עבר בה איש ולא ישב אדם שם".
לכן מוכיחים שהשמות אינם שמות עצמיים קודמים אלא על שם המאורעות נקראו שמותם. מרה על שם המים המרים, רפידים שרפו ידיהם מן התורה, מסה ומריבה וכו'.
וזה פירוש "מוצאיהם למסעיהם" - שהשמות הם של המאורעות - המוצאות אותם.
ויש מזה נפק"מ להלכה לגבי האיסור לשוב מצרים. שהשואל ומשיב סובר שלא נאסר אלא לשוב דרך כל אותם מסעות. אבל אם אינם שמות של מקומות בעצם ואין שם שום ישוב, מן הנמנע לעשות כן ולכאו' ד"ז לא ניתן להאמר.
מוסר השכל שהקב"ה מנהיג הקורות של כאו"א, וכל מקום שיגיע אדם, הוא ע"פ חשבון - המוצאות אותם. כמו שקרה כאן עם המרגלים שהקב"ה הצליח דרכם ותיכף מצאו את רחב.
ויהי בנסוע הארון - להפסיק בין פורענות לפורענות. מה פשר אלו פסוקים דוקא להפסיק בינם? ועוד יל"ע עמש"כ "כתינוק הבורח מבית הספר" - הלא כל המסעות היו על פי ה' בהעלות הענן, ולא נסעו מעצמם כלל, א"כ למה נתגנו ישראל על נסיעה זאת?
אלא פשוט שענין "כתינוק הבורח" נאמר לא על עצם במעשה אלא על הכוונה, שלא נתכוונו בשביל שכך צוה הקב"ה אלא נתכוונו לברוח מסיני. וא"כ מונן שבאו פסוקי ויהי בנסוע הארון - להורות שיסעו על פי ה' דוקא.
ואומרים "ויהי בנסוע" היום בביה"כ כיון שהיא מעין המשכן. ארון נגד ארון, נר תמיד, פרוכת כו'.
וגם עכשיו שאין לנו עמוד ענן ועמוד אש, צריך האדם להבין שכל מסעיו הם - "על פי ה' יחנו ועל פי ה' יסעו". (פרשת בהעלתך, במדבר ט כג)
"בורא נפשות רבות וחסרונן" - הנוסח אומר דרשוני. החת"ס פרשת עקב על הפסוק שמע ישראל כת' שלא מובן בעצם להודות על מה שהקב"ה ממלא חסרונות האדם, שהרי ה' ברא גם החסרון, ואילו לא ברא החסרון לא היה צריך למלאותו? אבל הביאור שאדרבא זה "להחיות בהם נפש כל חי" - האדם הולך וגדל דוקא ע"י קשיים וההתמודדות עמהם.
הרב שוואב בספרו על תפילה כת' שהט"ו ברכות השחר מקבילות להט"ו שיר המעלות בתהלים. ונמצא ש"שיר המעלות ממעמקים" מקביל ל"המכין מצעדי גבר" - (א"ה תלוי בגירסאות אם המכין מצעדי גבר קודם לשעשה לי כל צרכי) ללמדך שהעצה להתמודד עם "ממעמקים" היא לשים אל הלב שהקב"ה "מכין מצעדי גבר". על פי ה' יחנו ועל פי ה' יסעו.
מנהג העולם להיות מרגלא בפומייהו "אם ירצה השם". השל"ה כותב לומר כן, אבל הוא מתייחס דוקא להליכה, שיאמר אדם "אי"ה אלך למקום פלוני" - כיון שנאמר "על פי ה' יחנו ועל פי ה' יסעו".
"מוצאיהם למסעיהם" - עי' צפנת פענח שפי' שבעלמא אדם נוסע מסיבה שרוצה לעזוב מקומו, או שרוצה להגיע למקום אחר. אבל בנ"י במדבר לא כן היו, שהרי המקומות לא היו להם שום משמעות וחשיבות בעצם, כנ"ל, ונסעו רק - "על פי ה' יחנו ועל פי ה' יסעו." ועד"ז ביאר הגמ' שבת לא: "כיון דכתיב על פי ה' יחנו כסותר על מנת לבנות במקומו דמי."

יום שני, 5 במרץ 2012

Yisro The Man - Yisro 5772


There are mysteries regarding Yisro. These are mysteries that we can try to answer with a thought from Rav Shimon Schwab. Yisro becomes a Ger as it says in Rashi to 18:1 (יתרו: שבע שמות נקראו לו רעואל, יתר, יתרו, חובב, חבר, קיני, פוטיאל. יתר, על שם שיתר פרשה אחת בתורה (להלן פסוק כא) ואתה תחזה. יתרו לכשנתגייר וקיים המצות הוסיפו לו אות אחת על שמו. חובב שחבב את התורה. וחובב הוא יתרו, שנאמר (שופטים ד יא) מבני חובב חותן משה. ויש אומרים רעואל אביו של יתרו היה, ומה הוא אומר (שמות ב יח) ותבאנה אל רעואל אביהן, שהתינוקות קורין לאבי אביהן אבא. בספרי). Yisro was clearly Migayeir. What is very mysterious about Yisro is what he does afterwards. We know that Yisro did not stay with Klal Yisrael. Yisro travelled back to Midyan. If he is a Jew why is he going back to Midyan? Where is he going to find anything that a Yid needs to live? It is very strange that he goes back.
We find in Parshas Behaloscha in 10:29 (לְכָה אִתָּנוּ וְהֵטַבְנוּ לָךְ) where Moshe Rabbeinu begs Yisro to stay with Klal Yisrael and Yisro answers back in Posuk 30 (לֹא אֵלֵךְ) I refuse to go (כִּי אִם-אֶל-אַרְצִי וְאֶל-מוֹלַדְתִּי, אֵלֵךְ). Moshe Rabbeinu begs in Posuk 31, (אַל-נָא תַּעֲזֹב אֹתָנוּ) don’t abandon us and Yisro does not accompany Klal Yisrael. Why did he go back? This is something of a mystery.
When you learn Nach you learn about the descendants of Yisro who did come to Eretz Yisrael. But again, it is somehow mysterious on how they lived. You would think that Yisro’s children were full-fledged Jews as they were children of Yisro who was a Ger. We find in the first Perek of Shoftim that they lived in Yericho as it says in 1:18 (וּבְנֵי קֵינִי חֹתֵן מֹשֶׁה עָלוּ מֵעִיר הַתְּמָרִים, אֶת-בְּנֵי יְהוּדָה, מִדְבַּר יְהוּדָה, אֲשֶׁר בְּנֶגֶב עֲרָד; וַיֵּלֶךְ, וַיֵּשֶׁב אֶת-הָעָם). Yet it is very strange, we just Lained in the Haftorah of Parshas Beshalach that one of the families that descended from Yisro was a woman named Yoel. Of course she is the one who killed Sisra. The Posuk says when Sisra comes to Yoel that Sisra felt safe in the house of Yoel. Why? This is a Jewish home? The Posuk says in 4:17 (וְסִיסְרָא, נָס בְּרַגְלָיו, אֶל-אֹהֶל יָעֵל, אֵשֶׁת חֶבֶר הַקֵּינִי: כִּי שָׁלוֹם, בֵּין יָבִין מֶלֶךְ-חָצוֹר, וּבֵין, בֵּית חֶבֶר הַקֵּינִי). (חֶבֶר הַקֵּינִי) are the descendants of Yisro as it says in Shoftim Perek 1 in the Posuk brought above. Even though the (מֶלֶךְ-חָצוֹר) was in battle with Klal Yisrael the descendants of Yisro somehow lived separately. It is a very strange idea.  
We find this again when Shaul goes to do battle against Amaleik in Shmuel 1 15:6 (וַיֹּאמֶר שָׁאוּל אֶל-הַקֵּינִי לְכוּ סֻּרוּ רְדוּ מִתּוֹךְ עֲמָלֵקִי, פֶּן-אֹסִפְךָ עִמּוֹ, וְאַתָּה עָשִׂיתָה חֶסֶד עִם-כָּל-בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל, בַּעֲלוֹתָם מִמִּצְרָיִם; וַיָּסַר קֵינִי, מִתּוֹךְ עֲמָלֵק). We find here again that the Bnei Yisro lived separately. This is something of a mystery that I have never seen addressed at all.
Let me discuss with you something that Rav Schwab says about Yisro and then perhaps we can come back to understand. Rav Schwab writes that Yisro had a Shittas Hachaim. We know that different Jews had different paths in Avodas Hashem.  Even the Shevatim had different paths. Rav Schwab describes the Mehaleich (the approach) of Yisro as holding that the Derech to Avodas Hashem was with faith, Emunah that comes from Chakira. There is a difference of opinion among Rishonim as to the optimum way of serving the Ribbono Shel Olam. Whether with an Emunah Peshuta which is an Emunah based on a Mesora that we have from our ancestors who stood at Sinai. Or in an Emunah B’derech Chakira, or in an Emunah that comes from an understanding, a recognition, a knowledge of the Borei Olam. While there is a disagreement as to what is the best way to serve Hashem, there is a general consensus that for the Hamon Am the approach is Emunah Peshuta. Certainly we raise children with Emunah Peshuta and if they reach a level that they could come to Emunah Al Yedai Chakira then they reach that level.
Rav Elchonon in the beginning of Kovetz Mamarim in his Maimar Al HaEmunah explores the idea of Emunah B’derech HaChakira. At any rate, for the average Jew we raise our children with Emuna Peshuta. If they will reach the level of intelligence in order to understand they will come to a level of Emunah Al Yedai Chakira. Yisro on the other hand held that his Derech in Avodas Hashem was Emunah through Chakira. We know that Yisro was someone that tried all the Avodah Zora and ultimately came to a recognition of the Borei Olam.
Rav Schwab says this is the Pshat when Moshe Rabbeinu swore to Yisro that his first child would be given to an Avodah Zora. Now of course this didn’t mean for his first child to be given to an Avodah Zora in any complete way. But it means that he would come B’derech Hachakira to a recognition of Hashem. That would be his first child.
Rav Schwab explains that that is why in the beginning of this week’s Parsha it says 18:3 – 18:4 (שֵׁם הָאֶחָד, גֵּרְשֹׁם) and (וְשֵׁם הָאֶחָד, אֱלִיעֶזֶר). Each of his children is called Echad first. Gershom was his Bechor and he was to be raised B’derech Hachakira. And (וְשֵׁם הָאֶחָד, אֱלִיעֶזֶר) and the first child outside of that Shevua was Eliezer. This was Yisro’s Derech in serving Hakadosh Baruch Hu, to come to a recognition B’derech Hachakira.
If we understand this then perhaps we can answer the mystery regarding Yisro. Why doesn’t he stay in the Midbar and why does he go back to Midyan. The answer would seem to be that anyone raised in the Midbar could not possibly have to come to a recognition of Hakadosh Baruch Hu B’derech Hachakira, in that Derech. Hashem’s miracles were evident all around on a daily basis. If Yisro felt that his path in Avodas Hashem was Emunah B’derech Hachakira, then we can understand that he needed to be in a place that he can serve Hakadosh Baruch Hu in the best possible way. This may also explain why in Eretz Yisrael the family of Yisro stayed separate. They had a Derech in Avodah which was not accepted by the rest of Klal Yisrael, was not even desirable to the rest of Klal Yisrael. This may explain why Yisro kept himself separate and his descendants kept themselves separate in Eretz Yisrael.